Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg

Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg

Share this post

Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg
Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg
📌 AI case study: The end of the economic expert? AI's antitrust revolution
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
User's avatar
Discover more from Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg
Wild Intelligence is read by executives at BlackRock, JP Morgan, Microsoft, Google & more. We help business leaders frame the decision context in the AI era. Subscribe to unbundle AI with deep dives. Let us help you change how you think about the future.
Already have an account? Sign in
AI case studies

📌 AI case study: The end of the economic expert? AI's antitrust revolution

AI case studies: March 2025 | How is AI transforming the world?

Yael Rozencwajg's avatar
Michael Testa's avatar
Yael Rozencwajg
and
Michael Testa
Mar 14, 2025
6

Share this post

Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg
Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg
📌 AI case study: The end of the economic expert? AI's antitrust revolution
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share
📌 AI case study: The end of the economic expert? AI's antitrust revolution

The Challenge: Traditional economic consulting is slow, expensive, and prone to human error, especially in complex antitrust cases.

The Impact: AI threatens to replace human economic experts by providing faster, more objective, and data-driven analysis.

The Solution: Embrace AI-powered economic agents to improve efficiency, reduce bias, and enhance regulatory enforcement in antitrust litigation.

Dear reader,

It is my pleasure to have

Michael Testa
on this AI case study. Please give us some thumbs up!

Organizations worldwide struggle with fragmented data and siloed applications. This fragmentation hinders the effective deployment of AI agents, which require access to diverse data sources to perform complex tasks.

Traditionally, integrating AI with these disparate systems necessitates complex, custom-built solutions, leading to high costs, lengthy development times, and limited scalability.

This lack of interoperability prevents businesses from fully realizing AI's potential to automate workflows, enhance decision-making, and drive innovation.

Now, imagine AI agents that seamlessly integrate with your existing workflows, transforming from mere tools to powerful orchestrators.

This is the promise of Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).
It offers a solution that acts as a universal connector for AI.

Think of MCP as a USB-C port for AI applications. Just as USB-C standardized the way devices connect to peripherals, MCP standardizes how applications provide context to LLMs.

Share

Leave a comment

📌 AI case study: The end of the economic expert? AI's antitrust revolution | AI case studies: March 2025 | How is AI transforming the world?
📌 AI case study: The end of the economic expert? AI's antitrust revolution | AI case studies: March 2025 | How is AI transforming the world?

What's important now

The hallowed halls of economic consulting, long the domain of tweed-clad academics and six-figure billable hours, are about to face a reckoning.

The culprit? Not a regulatory crackdown, but a far more disruptive force: artificial intelligence.

We stand on the precipice of a paradigm shift where the advent of AI-powered economic agents will irrevocably alter the complex, data-intensive world of antitrust litigation.

Let’s be blunt: The traditional model is ripe for disruption.

The current system, reliant on human experts painstakingly sifting through mountains of data and constructing intricate economic models, is slow, expensive, and prone to human error.

Recent high-profile antitrust cases, with their labyrinthine complexities and terabytes of data, have exposed the limitations of this approach.

Imagine, instead, an AI agent, trained on the entire corpus of economic literature, legal precedent, and real-time market data. This agent wouldn't just crunch numbers; it would synthesize insights, generate sophisticated financial models, and even draft expert testimony – all in a fraction of the time and at a fraction of the cost.

This isn't science fiction.

The technology exists. AI excels at complex tasks, from diagnosing diseases to predicting market trends. Thus, antitrust litigation, which relies on data analysis and economic modeling, is a natural fit.

The economic consultant, that bastion of empirical certainty, is a relic. We cling to the notion of their indispensable expertise and ability to divine market forces from data chaos, but this is a nostalgic delusion. Their analysis is a human construct, flawed by bias, limited by time, and ultimately replaceable.

Why do we tolerate the exorbitant fees, glacial pace, and inherent subjectivity of human economic analysis when a machine, devoid of ego and capable of processing unfathomable datasets, could deliver superior results?

We don't need economists to interpret data; we need them to validate our preconceived notions and justify our strategic decisions. An AI programmed with rigorous economic principles would not offer that comforting illusion; it would provide the cold, hard truth.

Imagine: no more cherry-picked data to support a client's narrative, no more "expert" opinions swayed by lucrative retainers—just pure, unadulterated economic analysis, delivered with the speed and precision of a supercomputer.

The implications are unsettling, aren't they?

It's not just about efficiency; it's about control. We're comfortable with the illusion of expertise because it allows us to believe we understand the unpredictable forces of the market. An AI, with its dispassionate objectivity, threatens that illusion.

Consider the sheer volume of data involved in modern antitrust cases. We're talking about petabytes of information: emails, financial records, market analyses, consumer behavior data.

No human, no matter how brilliant, can process this volume of information with the speed and accuracy of an AI. This isn't just about efficiency; it's about the ability to extract meaningful insights from a sea of data that would overwhelm any human analyst.

Moreover, AI will not be bound by the limitations of human cognitive biases. Confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and availability bias are just a few of the cognitive traps that can distort human judgment. An AI programmed with rigorous algorithms and subject to constant testing can provide a more objective and unbiased analysis.

The disruption extends beyond the courtroom.

Consider the implications for regulatory agencies. These agencies, often understaffed and overwhelmed by the complexity of modern markets, could leverage AI to conduct more thorough and effective investigations. This would lead to more robust enforcement of antitrust laws, creating a more level playing field for businesses and consumers.

We're not just facing the disruption of an industry; we're facing the disruption of our self-deception. The economist bot isn't just a tool; it's a mirror, reflecting our own intellectual vanity. And that, more than any technological advancement, terrifies us.

Ultimately, the economist bot forces us to confront a question we've long avoided: what is the value of human economic expertise in an age of ubiquitous data and algorithmic precision?

If an AI can replicate, and even surpass, the analytical capabilities of our most esteemed economists, are we paying for insight or merely for the comforting illusion of control? And if the latter, are we not the ones being played?

Share

Leave a comment

Nonetheless, ultimately, the economist's job will be to have endless battles of assumptions. In economics, assumptions are not mere simplifications; they are the foundation upon which theories are built and models are constructed. They shape the way we interpret data, forecast trends, and prescribe policies. The choice of assumptions—whether markets are efficient, whether individuals act rationally, or whether inflation expectations are anchored—can drastically alter conclusions and recommendations.

Currently, several key assumptions underpin economic thinking. Many models still rely on the notion of rational agents, despite behavioral economics demonstrating the prevalence of irrational decision-making. Central banks operate under the assumption that inflation can be controlled through interest rates, though global supply chain disruptions challenge this premise. Another widely accepted assumption is that economic growth is inherently good, yet debates over sustainability and inequality suggest that growth at all costs may not be the ideal objective.

Perhaps, then, the AI economist will need to be prompted with assumptions, much like human economists. If it is to offer meaningful analysis rather than just a regurgitation of correlations, it will require direction on which principles to prioritize, which trade-offs to accept, and which uncertainties to acknowledge. And in that moment, we may realize that while AI can refine economic expertise, it cannot escape the fundamental debates that have always defined the discipline.

Share

Leave a comment


Share you thoughts

  • How do you think artificial intelligence is transforming the world?

  • Please take a moment to comment and share your thoughts.


📌 AI case studies

You are receiving this email because you signed up for Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg. Thank you for being so interested in our newsletter!
AI case studies are part of Wild Intelligence, approaches and strategies.
We share tips to help you lead, launch and grow your sustainable enterprise.

Become a premium member, and get our tools to start building your AI based enterprise.

Leave a comment

Share Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg

Yael Rozencwajg's avatar
Yehenew Seyoum's avatar
AKcidentalwriter's avatar
Michael Testa's avatar
6 Likes∙
1 Restack
6

Share this post

Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg
Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg
📌 AI case study: The end of the economic expert? AI's antitrust revolution
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share
A guest post by
Michael Testa
Alumnus of UCL, with experience in the UK Government Economic Service, Climate Tech, and a stint at Goldman Sachs. Known for making people laugh while advising on Carbon Markets, Biodiversity Credits, Natural Capital, and Tech Entrepreneurship.
Subscribe to Michael

Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Our AI safety mission | Systems from the AI dystopia series
Our call for action in the face of AI dystopia
Sep 30, 2024 â€¢ 
Yael Rozencwajg
5

Share this post

Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg
Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg
Our AI safety mission | Systems from the AI dystopia series
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
🎯 How to build with AI agents | Defining the virtual agent - beyond the chatbot
Part 2/6 AI virtual agents series | Get started with AI | How-to guides and features
Oct 9, 2024
4

Share this post

Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg
Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg
🎯 How to build with AI agents | Defining the virtual agent - beyond the chatbot
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
2
🎲 Mitigation strategy assessment
AI data and trends for business leaders | AI systems series
Mar 27 â€¢ 
Yael Rozencwajg
4

Share this post

Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg
Wild Intelligence by Yael Rozencwajg
🎲 Mitigation strategy assessment
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Ready for more?

© 2025 Wild Intelligence
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Create your profile

User's avatar

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.